Difference between old school and modern guitar distortion

Hello and welcome to this week's article!

Today we're going to clarify a bit what are the characteristics of the old school guitar distortion and the modern day hi-gain tone.

Let's start from the base: a distortion is an effect achieved by taking a signal and boosting it on purpose in order to make it become degraded, but in a controlled, euphonic way, with the aim of making it sound more aggressive and compressed, and this is exactly how it went initially; guitarists were plugging their guitars into tube amps and cranking them to the maximum (also because at the early stages there wasn't even what we might call today a p.a.), and the amps just couldn't handle it, so distortion was an unexpected (but usually welcomed) side effect.

Then Hendrix and rock n'roll in general exploded, guitarists were experimenting with their tone like crazy and pushing the boundaries with every record, and the amp producers simply adapted to the needs, creating amps (and pedals) capable of distorting on purpose without the need of putting everyting on 10.

Back in the day of the first hi-gain amps, distortion was permeating the whole frequency range, because it was generated both by the gain stages of the preamplifier and from the power amp, stressing its power tubes, and a good example of the early amps which featured a high-gain tone were the Marshall and the Orange amps of the '70s among the others.
An Orange amp is a good example of old school distortion: it's prominent in the low-mids, which makes it a bit dark sounding, and it's very distorted in that same area, making the tone not very defined and not easy to control, but very punchy for example with groovy single string riffs, like many Led Zeppelin ones, in which every note hits you like a truck.

Modern guitar distortion instead is all about control. This is obtained from amps which through the years had more and more gain stages and which relied less and less on the power amp to distort, until we arrived to amps with large tube power amps (e.g. 120w), with 6L6 power tubes which have a lot of headroom, and all this is to make the power amp sound clean and the amp to rely mostly on the preamplifier for its gain.
This different setup has 2 objectives: 1) to stress less the power amp, thus prolonging the life of the tubes 2) to have a cleaner, tighter low end.

To make the distorted sound even tighter, guitarists like to take a hi-gain head (for example a Mesa Boogie or a Peavey 5150), use the distorted channel and boost it with an overdrive, because it makes the input signal even hotter and the result is a tone with a fast attack, reduced low-mids and a tighter low-end (meaning that when playing a fast, palm muted riff the recoil of the lows is faster and less prominent, so you can hear the riff more clearly).

This solution is particularly good with low tunings (to be honest today it's very hard to even find a band that plays contemporary hard rock-heavy metal in E), because it adds clarity, so in conclusion the modern distortion is about a tight, controlled low-end (which needs to sound clean, because if it's too distorted the riff will sound like a mess, to the point that some metal amp has a separate gain knob for the lows and one for the highs) and a screaming, very defined upper mid range, with a clear attack and good string separation, if you want to play some articulate djenty riff like those of Periphery.

Clearly I have provided the example of 2 very different type of tones and there are surely a million tones in between the old school and the modern one, but I felt like explaining this difference, because it can help defining more the type of sound we have in mind.

Which one among the 2 do you prefer?

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!

Review: Audio Assault Klank (with video sample)

Hello and welcome to this week's article!

Today we're reviewing a new bass amp simulator from Audio Assault: Klank!

Klunk is the simulation of a preamp pedal that looks very simlar to some of the Darkglass ones: it features 3 levels of eq (one with knobs and two graphic ones, one of which in the rack after the preamp), 2 types of distortion, 2 shaping flavors (vintage and modern), compressor, noise gate, tuner and a dual IR loader with many bass IRs by Seacow Cabs.
One thing to notice about the ir loader is also the fact that you can move freely the virtual microphone on the speaker not only with the bundled irs but with any ir! 

This simulator is the third one for bass, after Bassgrinder and Duality Bass Studio, and it's the first one to emulate a pedal preamp, and it's the most advanced of the 3, it has also a very nice resizable UI.

How does it sound? It's sounds quite good, as you can hear from the sample, but it sounds also very versatile, thanks to all the IRs and the eq capabilities, which makes this plugin very versatile in terms of tone shaping.

What would I improve in the future? Here's my suggestions to Audio Assault: I would ship the plugin (not only this but all of them, since it's a problem that I'm encountering often) with a leaflet in pdf that explains exactly what each knob and switch do, because without it we might be lacking or misunderstanding some function; I would also add some graphic representation of the compression (be it a vu meter with the needle, or with the '80s leds, or in any other form), because it would help when doing some fine tuning and would spare us the need of an external compressor.

All in all, when looking for a very quick metal tone I still prefer Bassgrinder, for its capability of separating the distorted part and the clean part and because it features a limiter, but if you're looking for versatility and tone shaping capabilities you can't go wrong with Klank!

Thumbs up!

 

Specs taken from the website:

- 2 distortion modes

- 2 shaping flavors

- Graphic EQ

- Double IR loader with custom bass amp IRs from Seacow Cabs

- Rack with 9 bands graphic equalizer and compressor

- tuner, noise gate

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!

How to keep the bass stable with a limiter

Hello everyone and welcome to this week's article!

Today we are going a little more in depth in the topic of mixing with a limiter, and this article should be taken as an expansion of our "Should I put a limiter on each single track when I mix?" discussion.

My conclusion today of this whole discussion is that depends on the genre. 
There are genres in which the instruments with the biggest dynamic excursion (which are usually bass, vocals, maybe cymbals, clean or acoustic guitars and acoustic instruments in general), those in which the performer can really choose to play some part extremely quiet and extremely hard can use some track limiting, while in other genres like extreme metal, in which there is already a lot of distortion (which acts as natural compressor), drum samples etc, this is less useful and you can stick also just with the compression.

Let me elaborate more: 

If you have a song in which in the first half the singer sings with just a whisper and in the second half sings one octave higher, with very loud peaks, the first thing to do is to do some clip gain, then when the volumes are more or less consistent you can put some compression to make the track more coherent, and finally, since maybe in the highest and loudest parts there might remain some loud peak, instead of manually lowering every peak you can put a limiter with a threshold set only to check those, and bring them down.
In this case the limiter acts as final wall for the peaks that are so loud that still can't be properly tamed by a compressor, because if you would set the compressor hard enough to stop them, it would harm the rest of the vocal track, and the same concept applies to any other instrument.

The trick therefore, if you still hear some part in some track that is popping out too much, is first to try to see if you can solve in some other way, for example sometimes in palm mutings the low-end recoil can be solved simply lowering the bass on the amp or moving the microphone a couple of cm back from the speaker, but if you can't solve, the limiter with a high threshold, set just to stop those occasional peaks, can be a solution, just don't overdo it, like leaving it with a threshold that keeps it active all the time, or you will damage the sound of your instrument.

I hope this was helpful! 

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!

Review: Nembrini Audio Crunck v2 (free Vst plugin with video sample)

Hello everyone and welcome to this week's article!

Today we're going to talk about another interesting plugin, this time free, the almighty Nembrini Audio Crunck v2! 

Crunck v2 is the second version of Crunck, the first plugin designed by Igor Nembrini in the beginning of his career in DSP development more than ten years ago.
It's a virtual amplifier with a very clean and simple layout, which features all the classic controls of a real amp (gain, master, presence and eq section), and which has a bypassable cabinet section with a V30 speaker impulse response.

This virtual amplifier, which is one of the few ones available also for Iphone and Ipad through the App Store (free as well), is quite versatile and provides a very warm tone, with a gain knob that allows to dial a huge amount of gain, and lets you achieve quite a wide range of tones.

How does it sound? I'd say it sounds quite well, but it's more geared towards the rock and hard rock tones than the metal ones, since it has a lot of energy in the low mids that is not easy to get rid of (in the sample I have used an overdrive in front), so if you are looking for a creamy bluesy tone, or a fusion lead tone, this it's probably the plugin for you.

Anyway since it's free I suggest everyone to go check it out in the Nembrini website, a website that offers also other free plugins, along with paid ones.

Thumbs up!

Specs:

- 3 bands EQ

- bypassable cabinet simulator with built-in IR

- Gain, Master and presence knob

- available in all plugin formats and as Apple store app

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!

How to do drum replacement/layering in Studio One without 3rd party plugins

Hello everyone and welcome to this week's article!

Today we're going to see how to make drum replacement in Studio One without using 3rd party plugins!

Drum replacement has always been a very sensitive topic among musicians: some love it, many hates it, but the truth that every mix engineer knows is that they are very important, almost essential to any modern rock, pop or metal production.
In order to do it there are many ways, for example by using drum replacement plugins like Slate Trigger, Aptrigga, Addictive Trigger and so on, but today I would like to focus on a technique that is available (as far as I know) only in Studio One and that makes drum replacement (or anyway turning any rhytmical source into a MIDI) very fast and without using 3rd party plugins, just follow these 5 steps:

1) Choose the track you want to replace (or layer) with samples, for example an acoustic snare or kick track, and from the top toolbar click on the Q icon, this will open a sub-menu in which you need to click on "groove" to open a field that will analyze your track.

2) Drag and drop the desired track in the groove analysis field, it will detect all the peaks in the track and mark them.

3) click on the "Audio Bend" icon on top and it will show you more tools to adjust, from there go on the "threshold" one and adjust it until only (or mostly) the kick hits (if we're replacing a kick track) are detected (because usually with the basic setting it's so sensible that it will mark also for example the snare bleed in the kick microphone).

4) When you are satisfied with the peak detection create a new Instrument Track in Studio One, and load there for example your sampler or virtual drumset, and from the groove analyzer field you can drag and drop directly a MIDI of the detected hits into your new instrument track.

5) The final step is to assign the right sound to the MIDI and clean up the track, eliminating the remaining unwated hits, adjusting the velocity and if necessary by moving the whole MIDI track few milliseconds back, if you hear some slight delay.

Voilà! 

You will have a nice MIDI replica of your acoustic track, that you can use to layer new sounds on top of it or to replace it altogether.

I hope this was helpful!

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!

Review: Audio Assault Hellbeast v2 (with video sample)

Hello and welcome to this week's article!

Today we're going to review the version 2.0 of another Audio Assault virtual amplifier: the Hellbeast v2!

The Hellbeast is probably the heaviest and most extreme virtual amp ever made by Audio Assault, and it's modeled on the Randall Satan amp, an amp now discontinued (but that due to some licensing change has later been produced by Fortin under the name Fortin Natas). 

This amp has the particularity of having a master gain knob and 2 other gain knobs which lets you dial separately the gain in the lows and the highs, which is a great thing if you want a tight low end, because you can keep the gain lower in the lows (so the lows are clean and fast) and raise the gain more in the high end to make the sound more aggressive and modern.

On the other hand, if you prefer a more vintage type of distortion you can raise the gain in the lows, and you will have a tone more similar to an Orange amp, which will be good for stoner, doom, or '70s hard rock.

As in all the v2 amps from the producer, also Hellbeast has all the extra features that were lacking in the first version: a completely redesigned, resizable UI, 3 channels, stompbox, rack and cab sections completely redesigned with all new IRs made by Seacow Cabs, a preset manager and (exclusive to this one) a double tracking simulator, which basically takes your playing in real time and make it sound like it's 2 layers of guitars, which is good to create some wall of sound especially during songwriting, if you don't want to spend time double-tracking everything.

All in all this is yet another good simulator that got further improved, I can't say it's my favourite from Audio Assault, it's a bit too extreme for my taste, but it actually gives you some extra flexibility compared to the others, allows you to obtain tones to a level of fine-tuning that many other sims cannot produce, and the new features are absolutely worth the upgrade.

Thumbs up!

Specs:



- 3 channels

- 3 stompboxes: Gate, Boost and Drive

- Rack Fx: 9 band equalizer, Delay, Reverb

- Dual cab IR loader with dozens of Seacow Cabs IRs

- Preset manager

- Double tracking simulator

- Resizable user interface

 

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!

How to create manually the glitch effect on guitars, vocals etc...

Hello and welcome to this week's article!

Today we're going to talk about a mixing topic which can be applied to any type of wave source and that, if used with parsimony, can become a powerful arrangement tool to make the track more interesting.
The "glitch" effect simulates a digital artifact of any kind (usualy the fast repetition in loop of a small soundbyte), and it's used widely in rock, pop, metal, hip hop and electronic music (for example it can be heard in the song Sex, Death and Money by Alice Cooper) as icing on the top of a cake which must already be good, to make it even better.

In order to make a glitch effect of repetition, which is the most common, you need to start with quantization, so take a small slice of the guitar track (or both if we're applying it to the rhythm ones), set the quantization to 32nds and just repeat the slice for i.e. a couple of measures (16 times, for example) and push play.

The sound will be the typical one of the reading error of a cd player, and this is just the basic version of this effect.
Now we can get creative: try to quantize slices twice as long to 16th of note (instead of 32nd) to see if they sound better, or create a rhytmical pattern, for example a 3 slice repetitions, 1 empty slice, other 3 repetitions and so on, and in this the limit is really just the imagination.

So far we have mentioned only taking one slice and repeating it, but if we have for example a riff of 4 chords, we can also simply REMOVE one or more slices, rhytmically, from the track, to create a "stutter effect", or use repetitively the same single slice per chord, or we can even change the quantization from one measure to another and move from 16ths of note to 32nds, to add even more movement.

Finally, it's time to talk about automations: with these, you can take your glitched section and automate on it one or more effects in order to give it even more character.
You can apply on it obviously any kind of effect, but our suggestion is to try one of these 2 (or both):

- a pitch shift, or tempo shift effect, that makes the pitch go down fast during for example the final part of the glitch.

- a bit crusher that goes from 0 to 100 during the glitch, to make it sound like it's deteriorating during the repetitions.

Let us know if you use other cool glitch effects!

Become fan of this blog on Facebook! Share it and contact us to collaborate!!